While debate
                    has centered on the preference for Scotty’s v.
                    Shula’s, the waterfront restaurant
                    is just one small portion of a much larger
                    development plan that voters must
                    approve or reject in November. 
                  
After
                    reviewing the City of Miami’s commission-endorsed
                    restaurant/marina development
                    plan, along with the proposed lease agreement for
                    the 7-acre project,
                    the City’s two RFPs (2012 and 2013), and the Coconut
                    Grove Waterfront and Spoil
                    Island Master Plan (Sasaki), I have reached the
                    conclusion that the Grove Bay
                    development proposal is not in the best interests of
                    City of Miami residents
                    and taxpayers.
                  
Here are a few
                    of the departures from the Sasaki Plan (a
                    community-endorsed template for improvements
                    to the Coconut Grove waterfront) that would occur
                    under the Grove Bay
                    plan:
                  
- The southern-most hangar will
                      convert from existing marine or other recreational
                      usage to non-specific retail.
- Dry dock stacks will be
                      relocated within the site, with boat entry
                      redirected to northern basin.
-  “Floating
                      tourist docks” will replace existing boat entry
                      point on southern end.
- An unspecified “historic
                      aviation element” will be constructed.
- Retail space in MPA parking
                      garage will be changed from “marine” to general.
- “Non-historic additions” to
                      marine hangars will be demolished.
- The existing causal waterfront
                      restaurant with be demolished and a larger
                      replacement facility will be constructed nearby.
- Scotty’s -- the only existing
                      lease holder named in the Sasaki plan to be
                      retained: “a staple on the waterfront” -- is
                      removed from development proposals.
- A minimum of three new
                      restaurants with be constructed. 
Further, the
                    proposed lease agreement should raise the following
                    concerns:
                  
- There is no contractual limit
                      to the number of restaurants that can be built and
                      operated on the property. The lease will allow:
                      “one or more casual restaurants, one or more
                      formal restaurants” and “other related food
                      services.”
- There are no restrictions on
                      retail other than no “gun shops, pawn shops or
                      adult novelty.” 
- The proposed restaurants as
                      identified – Shula’s Steak House, Oceano, and
                      Hangar 42 – are not designated under lease terms
                      and may be replaced at any time with other food
                      service concepts and operators.
- Restaurants, retail sites,
                      marine services and all other parcels within the
                      7-acre development site can be "subleased or
                      reassigned” largely at the discretion of the
                      leaseholder (Grove Bay).
- 80-year lease term will
                      restrict the City from reevaluating and
                      re-designating the site for emerging needs.
Viewed in its
                    entirety, it's my belief that the development plan
                    as presented by city staff,
                    the development team, and as defined in the proposed
                    lease agreement represents
                    a significant departure from the vision expressed by
                    community stakeholders
                    and, ultimately, conceptualized in the Coconut Grove
                    Waterfront and Spoil
                    Island Master Plan. The community-backed Sasaki plan
                    designates the site as the
                    waterfront’s “Civic Core.” The challenge faced by
                    the design team’s planners
                    was to specify limited, low-impact development in a
                    way that would enhance,
                    rather than alter the existing character of “working
                    waterfront.” In my view
                    the proposed development – both as publicly
                    presented and as legally
                    permissible under lease terms – runs contrary to the
                    public’s expressed
                    preferences for access, usage and design character.
                  
Lastly, it
                    should be continually noted that despite the
                    existing structures and commercial
                    operations on the entire 7-acre parcel proposed for
                    development is
                    zoned CS (Civic Space) and the City’s land use
                    designation is “parks and
                    recreation.” In a city that ranks last among major
                    U.S. cities for parkland per capita,
                    we should move cautiously when considering best
                    options for a limited
                    public resource. The city has a long history of
                    leasing public land to private
                    development interests: Bayside, American Airlines
                    Arena, Museum
                    Park at Bicentennial Park,
                    Marlins Stadium, and, here in the Grove, Monty’s
                    mixed-use complex.  While the argument
                    is strong to maintain
                    existing boat storage and entry facilities at Dinner
                    Key, we should be asking
                    if the best use of our limited recreational space
                    and park land is for the construction
                    and operation of restaurants, shops, parking
                    facilities and, under the
                    open-ended nature of this lease, other possible
                    commercial ventures.
                  
I’ll hold on to
                    my suggestions for how this site might better serve
                    the civic needs of Miami residents and
                    taxpayers. Right now we need to encourage city
                    voters to reject this lease
                    proposal by saying “NO” in the November referendum.
                    That will give everybody
                    time to sit down and rethink a decision that will
                    affect us for many decades to
                    come.